Comment
Building for a Healthy Life 2026: The design update you may have missed
Updates to Building for a Healthy Life (BHL)[1] were recently published but, having landed with very little fanfare, if you have not heard much about them, you are probably not alone. Below, Design Director, Neil Woodhouse explores what has changed in the recent updates and explains why one of England's most established design frameworks continues to influence design decision making.
Unlike changes to the National Planning Policy Framework or other planning guidance, the latest edition of BHL has arrived with relatively little noise. Yet for many housebuilders, promoters, developers and landowners, it remains one of the most influential documents impacting how the quality of residential development is assessed across England.
For some readers, this may be the first indication that anything has changed. So, what do you need to know?
What has changed?
The short answer is – not as much as you might think.
The latest edition retains the familiar structure that has guided residential design standards for years but updates the guidance, examples and illustrations to reflect evolving policy priorities and current placemaking challenges.
There is greater emphasis on active travel, green infrastructure, healthy communities, biodiversity and environmental quality, alongside the core placemaking principles that have always sat at the heart of the framework.
Importantly, the update does not rewrite the rules of residential design. Instead, it seeks to refine and reinforce established principles through additional guidance, clearer explanation and a broader range of practical examples and case studies.
Evolution, not revolution
For developers, that's probably the most important takeaway.
The fundamental principles of good residential design look remarkably similar to those that existed twenty years ago. Successful schemes still need well-connected streets, attractive public spaces, a strong landscape structure, walkable neighbourhoods and a clear sense of place.
The updated BHL does not introduce a fundamentally new set of requirements. Rather, it refocuses attention on the qualities that continue to distinguish successful developments.
The challenge is therefore unlikely to be adapting to new expectations. Instead, it is about demonstrating how proposals have been designed to incorporate principles that have long been recognised as good placemaking practice.
Why BHL still matters
Whilst BHL may not carry the same formal weight as national planning policy, planning decisions are rarely determined by policy alone.
The reality is that local planning policy evolves slowly. Over the last two decades, many local authorities have embedded Building for Life (BHL's predecessor) and BHL principles into local plans, supplementary planning documents, design review processes and development management practice. As a result, the framework has become part of the planning system's 'Design DNA'.
The same cannot necessarily be said for some of the newer national design guidance. Whilst documents such as the National Design Guide and National Model Design Code have undoubtedly influenced design thinking, they have only been part of the planning system for a relatively short period.
In fact, the pace of change in national guidance arguably demonstrates the value of BHL's longevity. As a case in point, the National Design Guide introduced in 2019 is already being replaced through the emerging Design and Placemaking Planning Practice Guidance, illustrating how quickly national policy and guidance can evolve, be it updated or restructured.
By contrast, Building for Life and BHL have remained a consistent reference point throughout successive planning reforms, giving local authorities more than twenty years to understand, test and embed principles into their decision-making.
In many ways, BHL has become the common language spoken by planners, urban designers, councillors and developers alike. This raises an interesting question:
What ultimately carries more influence in practice – a document with greater formal policy weight, or a framework that has been embedded in planning culture for over 20 years?
Why its influence may continue to grow
As focus on design quality continues to come under increasing scrutiny, BHL remains a valuable tool for both applicants and decision-makers. It provides a structured framework for shaping proposals, whilst also offering a clear and widely understood basis for assessing whether proposals will create genuinely successful places.
Governments will change. National policy will evolve. New guidance will emerge. But BHL has consistently adapted whilst maintaining its relevance and core principles.
For developers, promoters and landowners, the 2026 update is unlikely to trigger major new design obligations. Instead, it is a timely reminder that one of England's most established residential design frameworks remains highly relevant and is likely to continue shaping conversations about design quality, placemaking and development outcomes for years to come.
For more information, please get in touch with Neil Woodhouse.
7 July 2026